Perpetual Melody

About Me


Welcome to my blog! Do leave your footprints as you stop by!
Main

Home
About
Guestbook
Contact
Archive

Categories

* * The Index * *

Links




Say 'NO to Dowry' Campaign


The women of India are an epitome of exploitation in the name of tradition practiced by the chauvinistic patriarchal society of ours. Despite all talks about gender equality, a lot of practices continue to exist in this day and age that treat women as commodities and chattels to men.

‘Dowry’ is one of those shameful practices. It’s almost synonymous with women’s oppression and degradation. There is ample evidence that the phenomenon of dowry is expanding, spreading to communities where it had never existed, and that the value of dowries is rising to untenable limits; there are horrific reports of fathers selling kidneys to cover dowry payments, or collective suicides in families with multiple daughters!

To understand this practice, lets first have a peek at the history of this system.
  1. A dowry (also known as trousseau) is a gift of money or valuables given by the bride's family to that of the groom to permit their marriage.

  2. It’s the amount given to the groom during kanyadaan (kanya=daughter, daan=gift)
     
  3. It’s also the amount given to the groom as a gift in the form of vardakshina (var=groom, dakshina=gift)
     
  4. In India, dowry was initially designed to safeguard women and their security by providing streedhan (stree=woman, dhan=wealth) in the form of money, property, jewelry and such gifts given solely to the woman at the time of her marriage, and the groom and his family had no right to it.
     
  5. In earlier times when the woman did not earn, her parents gave money to the groom since he had no extra source of income to support her.
     
  6. When the practice of bal-vivaha (bal=child, vivaha=marriage) was rampant, parents of both – bride and the groom, set up some money so that the couple could kick start their lives. Often, the parents of the groom were to provide for his education, and the bride’s parents provided for setting up the household.
     
  7. In our society, girls should be married off at the right age. One wants money, the other is desperate to get his daughter married at any cost!
     
  8. As the woman had no right to the ancestral wealth, it was given in the form of land, gold and other gifts during her marriage. This practice started with the maharajas and rich landlords and slowly percolated to every stratum.
    Firstly, I use the word ‘dowry’ only for forceful (implicit or explicit) expectations, asking for cash, clothes, jewels, wedding/reception expenses, honeymoon expenses, travel expenses, fees for education, furniture, appliances, household goods, vehicles, real estate, etc which play an important role in determining any marriage. But today as we see, this custom that was started with good intentions has been eroded and exploited to heinous levels. That streedhan which was supposed to be a safe net for her, went on to become a death trap. Dowry is sugarcoated with words like streedhan, vardakshina and kanyadaan.

    But there’s another side to this coin. There are quite a few girls who do support this practice. They think its their right to demand money from their parents since anyway they wont be having any share in the father’s property post marriage. And they also see nothing wrong with it since they are so desperate to get married. Yes, it’s a fact! It’s sad that girls still give in to such demands and pressures of the society.

    Dowry continues to be given and taken. Even among the educated sections of society, dowry continues to form an essential part of the negotiations that take place in an arranged marriage. Dowry is still very much a status symbol.

    Here are a few implications of dowry: (Ref: AidIndia)
    1. Dowry kills 16 women everyday (official) - (Govt. of India, National Bureau of Investigation, NBI).

    2. 68 women die everyday because of dowry (unofficial sources) - from Himendra Thakkar's article "Are our sisters and daughters for sale".

    3. Almost 2000 suicide deaths are reported every year as a consequence of dowry (NBI).

    4. Female genocide/infanticide is a direct consequence of dowry. The latest census data shows that the sex ratio in India has fallen from 945 (1991) to 927(2001) per 1000 males. Economically well-off states like Delhi, Chandigarh, Gujarat, Karnataka, Punjab and Haryana have the worst sex ratio.

    5. Domestic violence is on the rise and many of these are caused by inadequate dowry.

    6. Female literacy rates are incredibly low as a consequence of discrimination against the girl child 38% for women and 64% for men.

Ultimately just goes to prove that mere education doesn’t inculcate values and ethics. They are inbuilt, and are an integral part of a person’s character. It does not wipe out the tendency to take! While giving, they hold back their hands, but the same hands open in full capacity to grab whatever comes their way?! Hypocrites!

As more and more women are becoming financially independent, the purpose of giving and accepting dowry is getting diminished day by day. Women are educated and can fend for themselves. They can do well without men who are insatiable dowry mongers and who look at them as money-minting machines, or mere commodities, or forceful obligations. No more do we support the insanely extravagant demands as though the girl were her father’s liability, and eventually her ‘burden’ had to be shared by the groom and his family, hence a way of paying ‘damages’!

Unfortunately, the rebellion does not happen on that scale even now. Though I do know a number of women and men too, who are staunchly against dowry. Join us in the No Dowry campaign.

 

PLEDGE: I promise never to give or take dowry

Click here to sign the pledge

20.11.05 08:18
 


To date 6 Comment(s)     TrackBack-URL


Mr. SIF / Website (20.11.05 16:12)
Please teach Indian Women to stop marrying up first. Tell them not to expect men to protect and provide for them. 90% of dowry cases are false.
I am against dowry.
Replace with "Say No to Feminism".
http://www.saveindianfamily.org/blogs


(20.11.05 18:44)
well, most of women's problems stem from the fact that they expect men to provide for them. more often than not, they are content playing traditionally and cuturally advocated roles. and lets face the fact - men like to be providers and protectors, and women like to be protected.
now having said that, i also want women to break out of the mould and create an identity for themselves, and earn for themselves. i'm a feminist, but i'm not anti-men at all. i believe in a healthy comeraderie between the two genders, which often does not happen because one of the two often tends to be more dominating and over-bearing than the other.
and i've talked to women who support teh system of dowry! shocking, but true. and i also sympathise with men who have been victims of the anti-dowry 498A section. but that doesnt mean exploitation isnt happening. both men and women have been victims of the loop holes in the judicial system, but we have to find a way out of that.
talking against any gender will only intensify the issue.


Bharati / Website (12.12.05 05:25)
Since you commented on mihir blogs on dowry I would like to talk on certain inequality that is happening
One of the things to realise is that sucide statistics clearly show that men are driven to sucide by their wife more often then women by thier husbands you can read professor Nagaraj's studies on this
If you care to read the stories of deaths of women ou would see that they first murder their children then kill themselves where as mens suicde are nmainly solo you can get this from police directories
I am a little surprised from where you got the statistics that women are harassed from centuries the truth is that women always had better life expectancy then men so you canot sya that women have been harassed.
Men have always been teased by centuris for being forgetfull , cannot dfo work etc
Finally why don;t women pay equal taxes for equal slaries whta is the rational ???????


(12.12.05 05:31)


Ok well tell me which law is not misused? i would also like to draw your attention to a couple of other posts i had written:
Alimony/Maintenance to husbands?
Selling Myself

i'm not for it. i am not for the preferential treatment given to women. i was never for the 30% reservations for women in the educational system. I was never for the tax deductions to women. i never liked any of it, and never supported it. i know of a many women who never supported any of it either!

about the reservation for women in politics, i do support it, because theres no other way by which people would be able to see women in the cabinet. well, that apart, all the other reservations for women don't deserve to be there in the first place! i remember when i was in college and the 30% quota for women was introduced, my male friends were almost devastated. already reservations for backward classes take away a huge chunk of opportunity, on top of that women are doing the same thing! we were really unhappy! not many women support that! providing free education is acceptable, but not reservations! if a girl is going for higher studies, for post-grad, etc, she doesnt need reservations. she isnt oppressed! if her parents are willing to let her study, they must be a liberal family! such gimmicks work only at the grass root level, and should not be extended beyond primary education! besides, an even more disgusting part is that the same *career-oriented* girls give up on their jobs once they get married. till date, many parents feel that the girl should be educated only so she gets a good husband! why refuse opportunity to a deserving guy then? does the govt. offer reservations to girls so they get good, well-earning husbands?

speaking about the dowry laws, yes, i KNOW its being misused just like any other law! its one of the 3 cases: 1. ravan Vs sita, 2. ravan Vs sita, 3. ram Vs shurpanakha. (Ref: http://gender-indian.blogspot.com)

now our efforts should be directed in the direction of finding a respite for husbands who are trapped in false suits! trying to demolish the law or speaking ill about women is not going to do any good! all laws - criminal laws, corporate laws are misused daily! why not talk about that! why just talk about men and women misusuing it!? why don't we also realize that there WILL be a great many men who will misuse the recently introduced alimony to husbands act? can you confidently say that tehre is not domestic violence happening? but protesting against the act is not it. tehse laws have been made to protect the deprived, but they are being misused. so find a way to stop that! blaming teh opposite gender is not goign to change anything! it will make matters only worse! i know how simple it is to penalise a man by 498A. if i coem across a womn who harasses her husband, files a false case under 498A against him, i'll be the first one to speak out against her!

about why men commit solo suicides as against women who jump into wells with their children, is a different issue altogether. do go into the details of this matter and you'll realize that the husband in such cases is good for nothing, and the woman isn't assured that her children will be taken care of by him after her. of course, the very idea of suicide is a sacrilege, i dont like it, but i wont judge. people are driven to it.

also, why not talk about the other reservation systems we have in india?! out of teh state candidates account for some reservations, the backward classes have 52% reservations in all educational institutes! how fair is that? instead of creatign a healthy competitive environment, there are distinctions on the basis of caste! is taht fair? why cant teh govt simply provide them monetary help? i also know a lot of people from backward classes who are financially well off. they are good for nothign duds and get admission almost anywhere. even the eligibility criteria is low for them! and its such people who go on to become doctors and engieners! tehy fail, of course, in the long run because they arent competent enough! they dotn have successful careers, but they do take away teh chance of a deserving cadidate! is that fair enough? and then there are people who belong to the lower classes, are very intelligent, get good marks, but will take admissions in the open category, teh explanation they openly offer is that tehy want to give opportunity to their caste people! i was in tears when i had lost admission to one of my favourite colleges because i belonged to the open category. despiet havign good marks, i could not get there! i'm not against any class or creed. all are equal. but i'm just talking about the way laws are misused, and whether they should exist in the first place! its all dirty politics. a vote-minting strategy! similarly, i believe in harmony between the two sexes. if together, they can make things a lot better than when pitched opposite each other! we should realize that!

why don't people speak anything against other discrimination as well? and we call ourselves secular!! why waste our time fighting opposite genders? why not fight against that ugly trait in people (any gender)? we all know harrassment exists for both parties. why only highlight how men are oppressed? why not also look into cases where women are oppressed? why not work out a way towards a foolproof solution? why indulge in mud-slinging? how will it help us?




bharati / Website (20.12.05 14:50)
many IPC sections are not being misused
IPC Sections 182-250 are not being misused. I haven;t seen cases around it
-----------------------------------
The only laws which is being misued and there are enough evidences of its misuse are
section 498a and Dowry
Rape Laws ( in delhi out of 358 cases in August 241 were elopement cases
&
SC ST laws.
POTA laws
------------------------------------
The reason for misuse is clearly the statment inserted due to pressure from feminist organisation " innocent shall prove innocence". These are the laws which have these threads and it means that the standard of evidence required to try a case is lower as result.
Please note I faced threats from "respected" feminist organisation that if I do not pay up 35 lakhs to my SIL they will get my bail cancelled etc and they will conduct morchas.
---------------------------------
Regarding murder children I am not in favour of murdering children which you tried to justify . Clearly if you look more in statistics you wil find that women do not commit sucide more oten then men and neither does their sucide rate uincrease after marriage
where as for men the sucide rate increases by 50% after marriage that means 30% of the sucide for men can be directly attributed to their wifes none such can be attributed to women's suicide. Whcih means that 17000 men are being kileld or driven to death by their wifes which is 3 to 4 times the dowry death and yet on a sucide or death of wife immediately th husbads are arrested and please note Justice Saldhana reported that 44% of such cases are false .
IG Radha was harassed by her wife so much that he to go for solace inthe hands of god and as SIF predicted before it happened that his wife will file a dowry case whcih she did for getting his . is that not misuse ?
Another question ??
If a women has sex with a man and then when the man refuses to marry she files a rape case sayoing she had consensual sex under the promise of marriage . Is she brave girl or is she an un democratice women who is forcing an unwilling man into marriage through use of criminal law ?
and the reverse happnes where dumped lover throws acid on the girl now is he brave bouy who took consequence but brought his personal law to her ?


bharati / Website (20.12.05 15:12)
Regarding main article
male suicide itself suggests that the problem of men are equally horrific
60 men are driven to sucide by theirr wives every day which is 4 time the reverse
Himendra Thakur canot be trated as reliable becuase 68 per day is the total number of women who commit sucide and die of unnatural causes
This takes care of points 1,2 & 3
points 4 is just a conculsion without basis but if you want alternate hypothesis you might want to look here
http://gender-indian.blogspot.com/2005/10/feminist-responsible-for-female.html
point 5 is highly debatable when you start talking of sham kind of abuse like mental , verbal and smell abuse . women activists use the example of a lone mwomen dying to include all kinds of marital disharmony as domestic violence Violcence is not a word to be used lightly the way womens organisations are using . time for you to read the " who stole feminism" . on how alarmism best works to get more funds
point 6
is undiputably true and a shame but it is becuause men are still given the protector and provider role and hence are forced to go to school in the hope that they will drag the whole family up It is not a dicriminatory burden that is cause but the burden forced on men to carry

Name:
Email:
Website:
Email me when further comments are posted
Save information (cookie)



 Insert emoticons